Hong Kong police can now demand phone passwords under national security law (www.bbc.com)
from Sepia@mander.xyz to privacy@lemmy.ca on 23 Mar 17:23
https://mander.xyz/post/49368206

cross-posted from: mander.xyz/post/49367302

Hong Kong police can now demand phone or computer passwords from those who are suspected of breaching the wide-ranging National Security Law (NSL).

Those who refuse could face up to a year in jail and a fine of up to HK$100,000 ($12,700; £9,600), and individuals who provide “false or misleading information” could face up to three years in jail.

It comes as part of new amendments to a bylaw under the NSL that the government gazetted on Monday.

The NSL was introduced in Hong Kong in 2020, in wake of massive pro-democracy protests the year before. Authorities say the laws, which target acts like terrorism and secession, are necessary for stability - but critics say they are tools to quash dissent.

The new amendments also give customs officials the power to seize items that they deem to “have seditious intention”.

Monday’s amendments ensure that “activities endangering national security can be effectively prevented, suppressed and punished, and at the same time the lawful rights and interests of individuals and organisations are adequately protected”, Hong Kong authorities said on Monday.

The city has seen the arrests of hundreds of protesters, activists and former opposition lawmakers since the introduction of the NSL.

#privacy

threaded - newest

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 17:33 next collapse

Damn, I forgot my password, isn’t that crazy?

markz@suppo.fi on 23 Mar 18:06 next collapse

That’ll be really funny in prison.

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 18:13 collapse

I know :(

axus@lemmy.ca on 23 Mar 21:00 collapse

In the USA you can legally be compelled to unlock with fingerprint or face, but not PIN

T00l_shed@lemmy.world on 23 Mar 21:10 collapse

For sure. But in a totalitarian state they will surely throw your ass in prison until you “remember”

ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca on 23 Mar 20:04 collapse

At this point any law that they are proposing that claims to be against terrorism or protecting the children only serves to crush dissent. Real child protection hasn’t been considered for a long time.

Even if you can prove that repealing antiterrorism laws will mean more terrorism I think that is a risk we all need to take.