Danish citizens to ‘own their own faces’ to prevent deepfakes (www.thetimes.com)
from can@sh.itjust.works to privacy@lemmy.ca on 28 Jun 00:32
https://sh.itjust.works/post/41103547

Denmark plans to become the first country in the world to give its citizens copyright over their faces and voices in an effort to clamp down on “deepfakes” — videos, audio clips and images that are digitally doctored to spread false information.

#privacy

threaded - newest

cygnus@lemmy.ca on 28 Jun 00:44 next collapse

Excellent move and a good step towards using signing keys to authenticate genuine content, something I think will become inevitable across the board.

can@sh.itjust.works on 28 Jun 01:22 collapse

How would it work?

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 28 Jun 01:43 collapse

You probably claim copyright infringement if a shady cam face recognition service takes your image. And they’d have to remove it

cygnus@lemmy.ca on 28 Jun 01:49 next collapse

The article is unclear but that’s my reading of it too. It’s obviously infeasible to sue everybody who does this (especially if you’re a public figure, it would be hundreds of lawsuits) so I think the endgame is that if the content doesn’t have a signature, we assume it’s fake.

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 28 Jun 16:31 collapse

It would be almost impossible to know who even had a copy, but maybe it also gives a legal avenue to stop agencies selling your face data, since they’d be profiting off of copyrighted “works”

SolacefromSilence@fedia.io on 28 Jun 01:59 collapse

This reads like a legit version of SovCit theory

BCsven@lemmy.ca on 28 Jun 16:29 collapse

Heh, yeah. But probably just a legal way to be able to stop agencies selling your data, since then they are profiting off of copyrighted “works”

MsPenguinette@lemmy.world on 28 Jun 01:08 next collapse

Love this idea

T4V0@lemmy.pt on 28 Jun 01:09 next collapse

I read feces, and got confused for a sec, lol

besselj@lemmy.ca on 28 Jun 01:28 next collapse

Can’t trust the Fae

NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz on 28 Jun 01:59 next collapse

You wouldn’t steal a face

teft@lemmy.world on 28 Jun 04:12 next collapse

Nic Cage would.

Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 28 Jun 10:17 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/68f4504c-94c8-4491-bf8e-9603c90efd94.webp">

ieatpwns@lemmy.world on 28 Jun 03:45 next collapse

This idea will be shot down in America because somehow someway all ai companies will have first dibs on digital versions of your face

I can feel it

notfromhere@lemmy.ml on 28 Jun 05:45 next collapse

How is this supposed to work? What about identical twins? What about people who look alike (more common than you’d think)?

hitmyspot@aussie.zone on 28 Jun 06:46 collapse

I suppose it will depend on how the law is worded, however, when someone is being impersonated, that would be a pretty clear case.

brbposting@sh.itjust.works on 28 Jun 06:58 collapse

I still have a hunch one day certain types of people will wear a pendant that generates a new one-time-password every second along with a 360 body cam that captures their movements and the screen of the pendant.

Veo 3 isn’t too bad but we don’t know what it’s like to live in a world where Veo 15 is open source, local, free, and “abliterated” (uncensored). The first time someone claims it wasn’t them punching the victim in the face but the victim lured them to a trackable location and then released a fake video, demand and supply will follow.

That wasn’t me. Talk to my lawyers; they’ll connect you with my chosen Big 4 accounting firm who has the actual OTPs from that timestamp.