Don’t Fall for the Latest Changes to the Dangerous Kids Online Safety Act (www.eff.org)
from thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.blahaj.zone to technology@lemmy.ml on 16 Feb 2024 04:29
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/8813842

EFF’s take on the amended version of KOSA. TL;DR summary:

We are asking everyone reading this to oppose this latest version, and to demand that their representatives oppose it—even if you have already done so.

#technology

threaded - newest

Crackhappy@lemmy.world on 16 Feb 2024 07:10 next collapse

I am sad that censorship is still, still, a thing that is considered by the people who write the laws in the US. This law is antithetical to all of us who enjoy the freedom to express our views without restraint.

FenrirIII@lemmy.world on 17 Feb 2024 04:34 collapse

Always ask yourself, “Who profits from this?”

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 17 Feb 2024 13:39 next collapse

My read is social media companies and Karens. Social media companies because it raises the barrier to entry (would Lemmy be able to handle PII properly?) and gives them even more data.

Rob@lemdro.id on 18 Feb 2024 10:45 collapse

also, always ask yourself, “who gets a leveraged advantage from this?”

Mr_Blott@lemmy.world on 16 Feb 2024 07:29 collapse

Don’t Fall for the Latest Changes to the Dangerous Kids Online Safety Act

Could’ve worded that headline better. I’m all for getting rid of dangerous kids

XTL@sopuli.xyz on 16 Feb 2024 11:13 next collapse

But you should know that if it’s a law or act with kids in the title, it will have absolutely nothing to do with kids in any way

Mr_Blott@lemmy.world on 16 Feb 2024 12:42 collapse

That’s what dangerous kids want you to think

BossDj@lemm.ee on 19 Feb 2024 05:28 collapse

To the geriatrics in Congress, kid is anyone under 50

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works on 19 Feb 2024 15:39 next collapse

The older they are, the more dangerous they get.

Kusimulkku@lemm.ee on 06 Mar 2024 10:49 collapse

Sounds about right

[deleted] on 17 Feb 2024 05:11 collapse
.