X’s Premium users can no longer hide their blue checks (www.theverge.com)
from schizoidman@lemmy.ml to technology@lemmy.ml on 12 Apr 2024 02:52
https://lemmy.ml/post/14349647

#technology

threaded - newest

autotldr@lemmings.world on 12 Apr 2024 02:55 next collapse

This is the best summary I could come up with:


X made displaying the blue check optional last summer, and it’s unclear exactly why the platform plans to remove the feature — or when.

Once a status symbol, the blue check lost some of its luster after X shifted to a paid verification system under Elon Musk’s ownership.

A blue check then just became an indicator that the account holder paid for a Premium subscription.

X eventually rolled out the blue check to accounts with more than a million followers, covering most living celebrities (and some dead) as well as public figures.

Just last week, the platform doled out free blue checks to accounts with high numbers of verified followers — whether the owners wanted them or not.

The move (despite being announced earlier by owner Elon Musk) took some of these users by surprise.


The original article contains 226 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 40%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

Salvo@aussie.zone on 12 Apr 2024 04:07 next collapse

zirk.us/@colo_lee/112255086696380103

[deleted] on 12 Apr 2024 05:03 next collapse
.
metaStatic@kbin.social on 12 Apr 2024 05:52 next collapse

I use Wayland instead

jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml on 12 Apr 2024 06:14 collapse

We need a verified check-mark for true wayland users :P

GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml on 12 Apr 2024 15:40 collapse

Mister, that would require some form of proof that you use Wayland which is bad for privacy

Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee on 12 Apr 2024 06:11 next collapse

Lemmy definitely is by-far the best platform to keep up with what’s going on on twitter.

Zagorath@aussie.zone on 12 Apr 2024 06:58 collapse

Better than Mastodon or Blue Sky?

supangle@lemmy.wtf on 12 Apr 2024 13:38 collapse

yup

KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml on 12 Apr 2024 17:11 collapse

Could not they just use URL redirection instead?