birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Oct 2025 01:41
nextcollapse
Obvious spyware grift is obvious.
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Oct 2025 02:17
collapse
It’s owned by Amazon. A no brainer to avoid, really
PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org
on 23 Oct 2025 01:42
nextcollapse
I HATE IT HERE
sidebro@lemmy.zip
on 23 Oct 2025 01:48
nextcollapse
Here we go with this 1984-nonsense
Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Oct 2025 02:07
nextcollapse
Cough<bullshit>cough
harsh3466@lemmy.ml
on 23 Oct 2025 02:08
nextcollapse
This guy can get fucked
hperrin@lemmy.ca
on 23 Oct 2025 02:10
nextcollapse
Hey, how about zeroing out wage theft?
FoxyFerengi@startrek.website
on 23 Oct 2025 02:21
nextcollapse
Countries with extensive cctv networks still have lots of crime, almost like surveillance is the wrong answer to lowering crime or something
philophilsaurus@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Oct 2025 05:03
nextcollapse
Honestly if we want crime to go down we should just stop reporting it.
Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Oct 2025 08:10
collapse
How much good did it make in all these years before tv?
crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 23 Oct 2025 05:10
nextcollapse
It’s a good answer if you want to watch all the crime that’s still happening
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Oct 2025 09:43
collapse
Until police selectively disables some cameras whenever it goes outside.
shiftymccool@programming.dev
on 23 Oct 2025 12:28
collapse
It’s a good answer if your goal isn’t actually to lower crime but you say it is so you can add buttloads of surveillance for data gathering
rauls5@lemmy.zip
on 23 Oct 2025 03:09
nextcollapse
We are just so fucked from every angle, from this to Teams reporting everything you do to the man to everything else.
CCMan1701A@startrek.website
on 23 Oct 2025 05:04
nextcollapse
I’m just starting reading the book The Circle and I just got to the post where they announced the same thing.
chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
on 23 Oct 2025 06:49
nextcollapse
Lol. GTFO here ya clown. Anyone that lives in a big city knows that cameras don’t stop crimes. Tweekers, dirty cops, politicians… none of em give a shit if they’re on camera.
RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Oct 2025 07:01
nextcollapse
This just in, Ring’s CEO admits to being a complete idiot. Look at the cameras in the UK. Mass surveillance does not stop crime.
its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
on 23 Oct 2025 07:08
nextcollapse
001Guy001@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Oct 2025 08:38
nextcollapse
Oh that’s awesome I didn’t realize cameras are able to create a system where the basic necessities of life aren’t locked down by money, where people aren’t being disenfranchised/marginalized/exploited and not having to fend out for themselves figuring out any way to survive but instead working together to answer everybody’s needs
MrSilkworm@lemmy.ml
on 23 Oct 2025 10:55
nextcollapse
The only thing it will do is to further reduce our privacy and expose our data to big corpos
Zoma@sh.itjust.works
on 23 Oct 2025 23:47
nextcollapse
If you’re in the UK could you get prosecuted for saying something “grossly offensive” around one of those ring door bells?
this man’s face looks like about to emit a nasal laughter while he plugs a ring camera into a UPS, singlehandedly putting humanity’s most secured military zones to shame
sqgl@sh.itjust.works
on 24 Oct 2025 17:38
nextcollapse
A famous criminal lawyer in Australia told me that CCTV is a bluff. The perpetrator merely needs to deny it is them.
My friend employed an expert witness to perform computerized facial pattern recognition but the other party got their own “expert” to counter it.
pineapple@lemmy.ml
on 24 Oct 2025 22:00
nextcollapse
threaded - newest
Obvious spyware grift is obvious.
It’s owned by Amazon. A no brainer to avoid, really
I HATE IT HERE
Here we go with this 1984-nonsense
Cough<bullshit>cough
This guy can get fucked
Hey, how about zeroing out wage theft?
Countries with extensive cctv networks still have lots of crime, almost like surveillance is the wrong answer to lowering crime or something
Honestly if we want crime to go down we should just stop reporting it.
How much good did it make in all these years before tv?
It’s a good answer if you want to watch all the crime that’s still happening
Until police selectively disables some cameras whenever it goes outside.
It’s a good answer if your goal isn’t actually to lower crime but you say it is so you can add buttloads of surveillance for data gathering
We are just so fucked from every angle, from this to Teams reporting everything you do to the man to everything else.
I’m just starting reading the book The Circle and I just got to the post where they announced the same thing.
Lol. GTFO here ya clown. Anyone that lives in a big city knows that cameras don’t stop crimes. Tweekers, dirty cops, politicians… none of em give a shit if they’re on camera.
This just in, Ring’s CEO admits to being a complete idiot. Look at the cameras in the UK. Mass surveillance does not stop crime.
Ring CEO:
<img alt="" src="https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/929ac5de-40d9-4437-ade9-97abe28e43aa.webp">
Oh that’s awesome I didn’t realize cameras are able to create a system where the basic necessities of life aren’t locked down by money, where people aren’t being disenfranchised/marginalized/exploited and not having to fend out for themselves figuring out any way to survive but instead working together to answer everybody’s needs
The only thing it will do is to further reduce our privacy and expose our data to big corpos
If you’re in the UK could you get prosecuted for saying something “grossly offensive” around one of those ring door bells?
this man’s face looks like about to emit a nasal laughter while he plugs a ring camera into a UPS, singlehandedly putting humanity’s most secured military zones to shame
A famous criminal lawyer in Australia told me that CCTV is a bluff. The perpetrator merely needs to deny it is them.
My friend employed an expert witness to perform computerized facial pattern recognition but the other party got their own “expert” to counter it.
Ring doorbell is watching you.
He’s full of shit