MrOtherGuy@lemmy.world
on 19 Jun 2024 15:18
nextcollapse
Absolutely not. If anything, public officials would be the one group whose messaging I would understand being scanned so that the people can sort of keep them on check. But again, implementing such possibility that would still weaken security of everyone else as well so of course it should not actually be done.
henfredemars@infosec.pub
on 19 Jun 2024 16:23
nextcollapse
So the implication is that mass spying is the primary goal and protecting the children was a cover?
WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world
on 19 Jun 2024 16:47
nextcollapse
as always
fluckx@lemmy.world
on 19 Jun 2024 20:35
nextcollapse
We do this to find criminals, drugsdealers, paedophiles and terrorists. MEPS are never part of any of those groups.
Source: trust me bro
>.>
Rules for thee and not for me.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip
on 19 Jun 2024 22:46
collapse
Just remember “terrorism” is a generic term these days. Russia invaded Ukraine over “terrorism.”
It wouldn’t shock me if they started carefully monitoring political views to detect anything the state doesn’t like.
Protecting children has never been an intention or an outcome with these laws.
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
on 19 Jun 2024 16:33
nextcollapse
The law must apply to all, including public servants. As they are beholden to the public, they are subject to review and FOIA requests are automatically granted for the content.
Remember the rule of authoritarians: if someone wants to stop you from being suspicious, they want to stop you from doing the same things they’ve done.
The law must apply to all, including public servants. As they are beholden to the public, they are subject to review and FOIA requests are automatically granted for the content.
Now I’m suddenly not so against this law. Journalists paradise. They’ll have a field day!
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
on 20 Jun 2024 20:09
collapse
It would just result in them having official and unofficial devices, where all the things they don’t want linked to their person, political party or public knowledge is on a different device that isn’t going to get caught in the FOIA requests.
eveninghere@beehaw.org
on 19 Jun 2024 17:49
nextcollapse
Fucking hypocritic idiots.
Melody@lemmy.one
on 19 Jun 2024 18:51
nextcollapse
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip
on 19 Jun 2024 22:46
nextcollapse
Is this a shock to anyone?
wagoner@infosec.pub
on 19 Jun 2024 22:58
nextcollapse
How else will they continue to exchange illegal images with each other?
Veticia@lemmy.ml
on 20 Jun 2024 08:36
nextcollapse
How about making every message of government officials be public and saved in easily searchable database for the populace and make content of their screens be streamed 24/7? No? Why? Nothing to hide nothing to fear? Right?
You stupid fuck.
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
on 20 Jun 2024 16:55
nextcollapse
You think they use official devices for all their stuff?
threaded - newest
How to contact your MEP. We beat this bill last time, we can beat it again www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home
it‘s still the old list of MEPs, right?
As far as I can tell, yes
Privacy for me, not for the…
Hahahaha… No.
You (potentially) voted for this. You will suffer it as well!
Also all of my and everyones correspondence is confidental, now what? We in Germany have a law (Postgeheimnis) for that as well!
Postgeheimnis does not apply in some circunstances
Absolutely not. If anything, public officials would be the one group whose messaging I would understand being scanned so that the people can sort of keep them on check. But again, implementing such possibility that would still weaken security of everyone else as well so of course it should not actually be done.
So the implication is that mass spying is the primary goal and protecting the children was a cover?
as always
We do this to find criminals, drugsdealers, paedophiles and terrorists. MEPS are never part of any of those groups.
Source: trust me bro >.>
Rules for thee and not for me.
Just remember “terrorism” is a generic term these days. Russia invaded Ukraine over “terrorism.”
It wouldn’t shock me if they started carefully monitoring political views to detect anything the state doesn’t like.
Started?
Protecting children has never been an intention or an outcome with these laws.
The law must apply to all, including public servants. As they are beholden to the public, they are subject to review and FOIA requests are automatically granted for the content.
Remember the rule of authoritarians: if someone wants to stop you from being suspicious, they want to stop you from doing the same things they’ve done.
Now I’m suddenly not so against this law. Journalists paradise. They’ll have a field day!
It would just result in them having official and unofficial devices, where all the things they don’t want linked to their person, political party or public knowledge is on a different device that isn’t going to get caught in the FOIA requests.
Fucking hypocritic idiots.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAA
#No.
Is this a shock to anyone?
How else will they continue to exchange illegal images with each other?
How about making every message of government officials be public and saved in easily searchable database for the populace and make content of their screens be streamed 24/7? No? Why? Nothing to hide nothing to fear? Right?
You stupid fuck.
You think they use official devices for all their stuff?
I Really like the ending, it ties it all together. Id like to imagine Clancy Brown saying it directly to the EU
Found the real pedos lmao
Rules for thee but not for me.