Anyone else seeing that unhinged "UK phones require digital ID or get child-locked" screenshot making the rounds?
from TheIPW@lemmy.ml to privacy@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 14:46
https://lemmy.ml/post/52503425
from TheIPW@lemmy.ml to privacy@lemmy.ml on 09 Sep 14:46
https://lemmy.ml/post/52503425
My feeds have been flooded with it over the past 24 hours, and even some prominent privacy groups have been amplifying the hysteria. The panic claims everyone is about to lose full phone access unless they submit to digital ID checks.
While the actual situation stems from recent Westminster pressure on tech giants around device-level age controls and online safety, the viral framing is completely overblown. There’s no law turning every adult’s phone into a brick tomorrow.
That said, the underlying trend of pushing age-verification and filtering hooks deeper into OS-level infrastructure is still a massive red flag for encryption and digital sovereignty.
threaded - newest
shit, looks like I would have a cellphone then
Mecha comet
Is anyone making that claim? Based on what I see in that image, phones will have limited functionality. I don’t know enough about the situation to know if that’s overblown, but I certainly don’t interpret that as saying “bricked”.
Time to get a dumbphone
After all these news i bought an hmd global nokia featurephone , i dont really need smart apps thankfully. only calls . sadly a lot of people still need smartphones to work , these laws suck…
How is it locked down? Does that mean websites can’t track me because I’m using a child locked phone? Sounds like a nice feature, depending on how locked down it is.
There you go.
It’s crazy how quickly a policy debate gets compressed into online panic. Between people assuming their phones are about to become expensive bricks and others leaning entirely into the time to buy a dumb phone comments, it’s hard to separate the real threats from the noise.
Looking past the viral posts to see what’s actually being pushed, why the panic overstates things, and why privacy advocates are still right to be uneasy about the push toward OS-level age checks
unknownuniverse.uk/…/smartphone-id-panic/
Original content by The Unknown Universe, written by a human and not AI generated!
Oh, the government already creating a masterbaitorbase, to keep a record of every web page you considered jacking off to, is what, overblown fear?
GTFO. The Fear is underblown and we all know it.
In the UK for many years your sim card is on “adult content protection” by default and needs ID submission to the mobile operator for adult content access over mobile internet. Sucks, but that’s nothing new.
Haven’t heard of anything about this being done on a device level.
Thing is all you needed to do to unlock that content was go into a phone shop and show your ID, or a penny charge to a credit card. Not this ridiculous “upload your ID” shit.
Then you simply missed a few news stories:
This is why countries need constitutions that limit what laws governments are allowed to pass. This is approximately the prototype of something governments just shouldn’t be allowed to ever do.
Is it better people think this is entirely true if it gets them to take their privacy and data sovereignty more seriously at a large scale? The average person already distrusts big tech and governments. What’s to say half truths don’t help us all overall?
Not sure what crowds you’re running with, but this has absolutely not been my experience.
give it time
Good luck with that on a GrapheneOS phone.
When I was in Scotland, I purposely brought an old iPhone that was passed down to me with an EU account to see if Apple will show this prompt in Settings. Nothing ever appeared in the Settings, only the Apple prompt urging you to set up Apple Pay.
Interestingly, when I signed in to Instagram account I only use for our class group chats (to which I rarely write messages because of CC1.0 in force) and had my VPN set to London, no age verification prompt ever appeared. Tbh it was before the Meta settlement, but still.
So yeah, it’s overblown to high hell.
I’d say good luck extending this to desktops, but MS might beat them to the punch if this becomes standardized and apps/sites start blocking alt OSes like Linux or BSD and start vendor-locking to Windows for age-gate DRM purposes.
Is it not accurate? That’s exactly what happened in Australia with similar laws. I was able to use a fake ID to bypass it but without that I wouldn’t be able to use any iOS/macOS device without restrictions
I can sleep in peace knowing my graphene phone will never have it.
though i worry for the societal implications. we can’t run away forever into smaller and smaller niches.
Run away? But i have so much to do right where I am at!
Im not running away. Ill always gonna be fighting against the state. Graphene OS makes it more easy.
I’m not familiar with UK legislation in particular, but considering approaches taken by other legislative bodies, their works effectively require online services to serve “age-appropriate experiences” based on age signals; which includes websites, applications and application stores. So unless an adult is content with just experiences deemed “appropriate” for all users (even children under 10), the user is extremely limited in their access. So I don’t think “bricked” is necessarily an overstatement.