Harvard dropouts to launch ‘always on’ AI smart glasses that listen and record every conversation (techcrunch.com)
from kerntucky@infosec.pub to privacy@lemmy.ml on 21 Aug 12:26
https://infosec.pub/post/33445279

Two former Harvard students are launching a pair of “always-on” AI-powered smart glasses that listen to, record, and transcribe every conversation and then display relevant information to the wearer in real time. 

“Our goal is to make glasses that make you super intelligent the moment you put them on,” said AnhPhu Nguyen, co-founder of Halo, a startup that’s developing the technology. 

Or, as his co-founder Caine Ardayfio put it, the glasses “give you infinite memory.” 

“The AI listens to every conversation you have and uses that knowledge to tell you what to say … kinda like IRL Cluely,” Ardayfio told TechCrunch, referring to the startup that claims to help users “cheat” on everything from job interviews to school exams.

#privacy

threaded - newest

[deleted] on 21 Aug 12:59 next collapse

.

birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 21 Aug 13:33 next collapse

Ew, spyware. This def violates GDPR

Libb@piefed.social on 21 Aug 13:55 next collapse

“Our goal is to make glasses that make you super intelligent the moment you put them on,”

A bit too late guys, as glasses have always made anyone look super intelligent. If that wasn't the case, why would anyone want to wear them? Because that's the only reason I wear mine, and certainly not because I'm as blind as a bat when I don't.

More seriously, their plan is to kill IRL conversations by making it impossible to trust anyone we would directly talk to?

Impressive. Sad & frightening, but impressive.

Also, I wonder who they will blame the moment they realize the hell they will have made of everybody's interactions?

edit: typos

LePoisson@lemmy.world on 21 Aug 15:54 collapse

Sucks for glasses wearers who are about to be having a lot of blurry conversations when everyone starts to tell everyone to take off their glasses before they talk.

Libb@piefed.social on 21 Aug 16:49 collapse

Yep, the first thing I imagined: how shitty would it be to not be able to see who I'm talking to... because I value my (and other's) privacy I would ask them to not wear their glasses and would not be wearing mine ;)

timmytbt@sh.itjust.works on 21 Aug 14:37 next collapse

The sad thing is that people will buy this shit

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 21 Aug 16:50 collapse

i’m glad that my own vanity will prevent me from getting these. lol

DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 21 Aug 15:08 next collapse

Did we not fucking learn anything from Black Mirror?

“The Entire History of You?”

root@aussie.zone on 21 Aug 16:14 next collapse

Black mirror is no longer sci-fi. It is slowly becoming a documentary. - Louis Rossman

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network on 21 Aug 17:10 next collapse

Right wing people seem to have no media literacy.

ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 22 Aug 11:53 collapse

I wish someome would ELI5 media literacy. So if I see an article, but I can read between the lines and know what it really means, or that it is sensationalized click bait, am I media literate? Or does it mean I am aware of trackers and surveillance on everything? Does it mean I know to check international news sources to be more well rounded?

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network on 22 Aug 15:32 next collapse

Well, there’s en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_literacy but that’s not written for children

I don’t think, of your examples, trackers and surveillance are a big part of it. Understanding subtext and credibility are more relevant. Like, recognizing when a newspaper always uses passive voice when cops do bad (eg: “man killed after violent police encounter” vs “police fatally shoot man waiting at bus stop”), but active voice for other people (eg: “Looters destroy small business shops” vs “Downtown shops damaged during anti-corruption protests”)

Also in fiction, being able to take away more than just the plot. Like you can read Dracula as just a book about a guy that bites people, but there are way more ways to read it. When someone makes a movie out of the story, notice what parts they keep, emphasize, and drop.

Maeve@kbin.earth on 22 Aug 16:46 collapse

Archive sites

ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 22 Aug 20:19 collapse

Damn, how did you know that’s why I couldn’t read that?

phase@lemmy.8th.world on 21 Aug 20:22 collapse

People missed those are warnings. They have no imagination so they took those as advices or even manuals. In a sense, they learnt.

Tangentism@lemmy.ml on 21 Aug 15:16 next collapse

Are they “drop outs” or were they ‘asked’ to leave the establishment?

Maeve@kbin.earth on 21 Aug 15:57 collapse

Thiel/Yarvin/ acolytes probably. I didn't look up who owns the VC funds but I expect no one not sociopathic.

Cenotaph@mander.xyz on 21 Aug 16:19 collapse

Does anyone not sociopathic own a VC fund?

Maeve@kbin.earth on 21 Aug 16:36 collapse

"Vulture Capitalist" funds?

electric_nan@lemmy.ml on 21 Aug 18:38 next collapse

Seems likely to run afoul of two-party consent laws.

IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world on 22 Aug 18:09 collapse

“Move fast and break things” - arrogant fucks

LiveLM@lemmy.zip on 22 Aug 05:29 next collapse

LTT did a hands on with a similar product, the Frame by Brilliant Labs. It sucked.
I do not expect this to fare any better.

onlooker@lemmy.ml on 22 Aug 13:02 next collapse

If their glasses make you “super intelligent” when you put them on, then maybe they should put on their own product and finish school? That was my line of thinking, until I got to this part of the article:

Ardayfio called the glasses “the first real step towards vibe thinking.”

…and then I realized I have no idea what the hell they’re talking about and stopped reading.

ComradePedro@lemmy.ml on 22 Aug 17:40 next collapse

You won’t even have to think anymore, let AI think for you!, you’ll be thoughtless and content

porksnort@slrpnk.net on 22 Aug 23:47 collapse

What the Hell even is that?

SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world on 22 Aug 17:18 next collapse

Didn’t Google try this and canned the project after nobody wanted to wear them or be recorded all the time?

McWizard@lemmy.zip on 22 Aug 19:17 collapse

There’s a nice marketing explanation for it: youtube.com/shorts/moaeyoc2NI4

rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de on 22 Aug 19:48 next collapse

let me know when some dropout has an idea that’s actually novel with sound engineering to back it up.

HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml on 22 Aug 20:01 next collapse

Are they trying to evoke the Mark Zuckerberg or Steve Jobs vibe by saying Harvard dropouts? Do they not realize that those are HORRIBLE people no one should ever look up to?

Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world on 22 Aug 20:50 next collapse

TLDR; Two wannabe tech bros drop out of college to make yet another pair of smart glasses that will fail because nobody wants it.

geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml on 23 Aug 00:29 next collapse

Is dropping out of Harvard considered something to brag about now?

ckmnstr@lemmy.world on 23 Aug 08:50 collapse

In the tech bro / VC world “Harvard Dropout” equates to an MD title in a hospital. It’s instant credibility.

pieman@lemmy.ml on 23 Aug 02:19 collapse

literally them: 🤓