FOSS Alternative to Privacy?
from ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev to privacy@lemmy.ml on 07 Aug 15:51
https://programming.dev/post/35252610

Are there any FOSS alternatives to privacy.com? I want to conceal my actual card information when registering with a new account on different platforms so I can create limits, but I can’t shake the feeling that privacy.com probably just sells my transaction history. If there’s any alternatives to privacy.com that are more transparent, I’d love to know!

#privacy

threaded - newest

MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Aug 16:21 next collapse

Agreements with payment processors are needed to process payments on platforms like that, so it’s not a feasible thing for a small open source project to pull off IMO.

If you just want limits on virtual cards, some credit cards have that built in already, Citi for example.

ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev on 07 Aug 17:37 collapse

I’m mostly seeing if I can obfuscate my card details - the card limit is more of a nice feature but not needed

MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 07 Aug 19:15 collapse

They do that too, because they generate a unique virtual card number each time.

0x0@lemmy.zip on 07 Aug 16:47 next collapse

Sure, Monero, otherwise you have to use payment processors and they’ll KYC you to the moon and back because Think of the children™.

Ulrich@feddit.org on 07 Aug 17:13 collapse

even privacy.com will KYC you

grey_maniac@lemmy.ca on 07 Aug 17:25 collapse

KYC?

ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev on 07 Aug 17:31 next collapse

Know your customer

grey_maniac@lemmy.ca on 08 Aug 00:08 collapse

Thanks

Ulrich@feddit.org on 07 Aug 17:43 collapse

Know. Your. Customer. Basically they verify your identity before providing you with any services. It’s a common phrase in the crypto space.

[deleted] on 07 Aug 17:51 next collapse

.

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 07 Aug 18:45 next collapse

that implies you can use crypto without being identified at any step of the way?

…no? It just means that they don’t necessarily know every little detail about you before you start using their service. What comes afterwards is up to whoever wants to track you. Most crypto currencies are pseudo anonymous at best.

Ulrich@feddit.org on 08 Aug 15:17 collapse

Crypto does not require any services. But if the person you’re trying to send to doesn’t accept crypto then you can’t send it.

frongt@lemmy.zip on 07 Aug 23:47 next collapse

It’s not a cryptocurrency term, it’s finance.

grey_maniac@lemmy.ca on 08 Aug 00:07 collapse

I assume you mean the cryptocurrency space? I haven’t encountered in the cryptography space.

Ulrich@feddit.org on 08 Aug 15:16 collapse

Yes, “crypto” typically refers to cryptocurrency, not cryptography, in my experience.

AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml on 07 Aug 18:03 next collapse

Other than crypto or cash based prepaid debit cards. There is no other service that will allow you to do financial transactions without doing basic KYC and keeping a record of your transactions required by law in almost all countries. They may claim it’s for legal reasons only and they don’t sell it but can you trust them? And how much do you trust your government to respect your privacy and not subpoena those transactions because they deem them to be unlawful.

LemmyThinkAboutThat@lemmy.myserv.one on 07 Aug 19:35 next collapse

Call your credit card company. Depending on the company/bank, they will either give you a few virtual numbers and/or have the option of having one virtual number locked to a certain merchant or utility company.

There’s MySudo (which I subscribe to) but they charge 3%. It’s basically the same as using Privacy.com. Good luck!

EDIT MySudo is not open-source, sorry.

pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 08 Aug 04:23 next collapse

I’d love to have that, but such a service has to comply with government regulations and payment systems requirements in order to issue virtual cards that are generally accepted. I can imagine a company that would open source their code, but what benefit would it be for you? You can’t self-host it and you cannot audit their infrastructure to confirm they run exactly the same code they publish… You want trustless finances - go crypto and say goodbye to convenience and wide acceptance.

Otherwise, you have to trust a middleman. And if we are talking about trust, privacy.com looks trustworthy. They have paid plans, so it doesn’t look like selling clients data is their business model. They clearly say they don’t sell users data in their privacy policy, which makes them a potential target for lawsuit if they caught lying. They haven’t been caught on anything nasty. Good enough for me. You do you.

[deleted] on 08 Aug 20:52 next collapse

.

ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 16 Aug 06:33 collapse

You can buy gift cards at drug stores and just use those.