anonymous chatting is officially illegal (www.youtube.com)
from DiabeticNomad@lemmy.ml to privacy@lemmy.ml on 09 Jun 13:21
https://lemmy.ml/post/48501893

#privacy

threaded - newest

Mearcfara@lemmy.ml on 09 Jun 18:53 next collapse

tl;dw?

calidris@hexbear.net on 10 Jun 00:28 next collapse

It just talks about age verification

zweieuro@lemmy.world on 11 Jun 08:38 collapse

… It’s 10 minutes of clearly spoken English, I worry about your attention span…

Mearcfara@lemmy.ml on 11 Jun 20:21 next collapse

Ad Hominem. If you can make a point without a logical fallacy, we can talk.

queermunist@lemmy.ml on 11 Jun 20:23 next collapse

I will never click on a video link.

ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works on 15 Jun 07:19 collapse

<img alt="" src="https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/599415b7-841b-4282-a011-b20263b9b560.jpeg">

Hiro8811@lemmy.world on 09 Jun 19:52 next collapse

From the article linked in the video

Researchers investigating Discord’s age-verification checks say they discovered an exposed frontend belonging to Persona, the identity-verification vendor used by Discord. It revealed a far more expansive surveillance and financial intelligence stack than a simple “teen safety” tool.

zweieuro@lemmy.world on 11 Jun 08:37 collapse

While what he says is broadly correct and I like that he makes it simple and understandable. I would like to add that: Companies aren’t ‘subject’ to this because they are forced by government. Companies actively lobbied for these laws so that they can say ‘the government forces us’ since the lobbying is WAY easier (and behind more closed doors) than actually implementing such a data harvesting tool as a single company.

His wording makes it sound like ‘big brother wants your data’ and while the gov profits immensely from this harvesting as well, the companties primarily got this thing going by lobbying for it, like meta lobbying for verification laws wayyy ahead of this implementation wave we are seeing.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lYsO4k7OIY

Check the sources they cite.