Great article, with a pretty cool (or warm) solution to the problem.
JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 11:41
nextcollapse
Trying very hard not to come to the conclusion that if you waste 2000 bucks on a connected bed, you have only yourself to blame.
Seriously. Unlike dumb TVs, dumb beds are not going away. Buy one for 400 bucks and donate the remainder of your bed-buying fortune. Your body won’t notice and €1600 can do a lot of good.
kibiz0r@midwest.social
on 22 Feb 15:17
nextcollapse
When you blame consumers for allowing antisocial tech into their lives, you’re doing free work for the tech barons.
JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 18:44
collapse
So nobody has any agency and we’re all just helpless puppets on strings?
JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 18:51
nextcollapse
As a regular traveler I have slept in a lot of beds. Maybe 300 (sic) in the last decade, of all quality levels. For me it makes all but no difference to how much sleep I get, the only thing that bothers me is when the springs are literally sticking out. So this is all completely anecdotal and I do respect your own anecdote. But I can’t help noticing that I see it repeated in lots of bed adverts.
How old are you? Once you reach middle-age shit starts breaking, even if you’re fit which most of us aren’t. You’ll notice a good bed at forty much more than you will at twenty. By sixty you’ll be demanding one.
Hahaha nahhh I have a spouse I’ve been with forever and we’re never having kids, so we can sleep as much as we want to. I don’t get 13 hours EVERY day, but occasionally we get fucked up on various substances and need a long day of hibernation afterwards. Last night we got about four hours (special occasion party time!) so tonight we’ll probably get 10+ hours of sleep.
No shade on peeps who want families but that’s not for us. We gon’ hedonistically burn bright until we die. That’s our best life hahahaha
RobotToaster@mander.xyz
on 22 Feb 17:40
nextcollapse
I’ve read some people get help from the cooling these provide, but I think there’s versions without subscriptions.
Also I’ve read of people buying shit like this in the hope it helps intractable insomnia, and they probably aren’t thinking that clearly, because of sleep deprivation.
JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 19:04
collapse
I share your suspicions but I’d go further. The bed industry has always struck me as an obvious scam that plays on people’s nebulous health anxieties and also on the tempting cognitive fallacy that, since an 8-hour night is the same amount as an 8-hour workday, the exact physical makeup of your bed is somehow as important as your career or something. It all strikes me as almost completely irrational. People slept for aeons on straw and somehow survived. A bed is a soft flat object, any other abstract properties are just marketing IMO.
Also, eight hours is a modern invention! Throughout most of human history we slept several times a day, rather than just once.
I’m really liking siestas these days and can’t go back to a single eight hour block.
JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 19:51
collapse
Absolutely. The 8-hour sleep is probably just a marketing invention, related to modern electric light. In pre-modern Europe it was common to get up and do housework in the middle of the night.
If the protocol was documented and simple enough, and if you could make it talk to your smart home RPi, then one could replace AWS with nginx + a perl or lua module.
CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 19:33
collapse
A shared account doesn’t mean everyone who works there has access to it, or that those who do have access aren’t subject to some type of access control.
The article basically goes on to say that the existence of this key makes a huge difference to the security/privacy of the product. It argues that using it, someone could access data from the device, or use it to upload arbitrary code to the device for it to run. However, those are both things the user is already trusting the company with. They have to trust that the company has access controls/policies to prevent individual rogue employees doing the things described. It seems unreasonable to say that an SSH key being on the device demonstrates that those controls aren’t in place.
I agree to an extent, the user already uses a cloud service. So they have to trust the provider.
And as far as a bed goes, I suppose you can’t expect the customer to ssh into it if something goes wrong and you have to fix it.
Both seems reasonable to me.
CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world
on 23 Feb 09:56
collapse
Yeah, its not unreasonable that you’d have a remote way to access the device to gather debug data with the customers consent. An SSH key in the firmware is a flexible way to do that, so long as there are good controls in place to ensure that it isn’t misused.
I could completely see this email address being a shared email address and not tied to a single user.
CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world
on 22 Feb 22:28
collapse
I’m 90% sure it is not a single user. I just don’t see how that really affects the security of the product, given that the company that sells it can already do the things the author is saying can be done if you have this key.
To be clear, I wouldn’t buy this. I just don’t think the SSH key makes it any worse than it already was
Would you rather one person have access to your device / data to potentially perform malicious actions or multiple people access to your device / data to potentially perform malicious actions?
And if you tell me multiple people, you’re full of it.
CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world
on 23 Feb 09:52
collapse
I think multiple people already have access to the databases that store the data the device sends. I don’t really care whether they get the data from the device itself or from the database.
Similarly, I think multiple people have the ability to make changes to the firmware build and the systems that distribute it. So those people already have the potential ability to gain access to the device.
One person or multiple people having unauthorised access are both unacceptable. I’m saying that the users have to trust the companies ability to prevent that occurring, and that therefore this particular technical detail is mostly irrelevant
parpol@programming.dev
on 22 Feb 12:55
nextcollapse
I was willing to overlook:
The bed costs $2,000
It won’t function if the internet goes down
Basic features are behind an additional $19/mo subscription
The bed’s only controls are via mobile app
My man would have been willing to overlook having Jeff bezos himself sleep in his bed with him before realizing what was happening.
threaded - newest
This is fucked up, but it’s still somehow better than a Murphy Bed backdoor.
Great article, with a pretty cool (or warm) solution to the problem.
Trying very hard not to come to the conclusion that if you waste 2000 bucks on a connected bed, you have only yourself to blame.
Seriously. Unlike dumb TVs, dumb beds are not going away. Buy one for 400 bucks and donate the remainder of your bed-buying fortune. Your body won’t notice and €1600 can do a lot of good.
When you blame consumers for allowing antisocial tech into their lives, you’re doing free work for the tech barons.
So nobody has any agency and we’re all just helpless puppets on strings?
On the contrary. I want people to have their own opinions, and to buy the things that suit their tastes even if they seem silly to me.
And I want those things to have fair, consumer-friendly regulations applied to them.
And when companies try to abuse their consumers, and I want us to criticize the company rather than the consumer.
I can get on board with that.
.
As a regular traveler I have slept in a lot of beds. Maybe 300 (sic) in the last decade, of all quality levels. For me it makes all but no difference to how much sleep I get, the only thing that bothers me is when the springs are literally sticking out. So this is all completely anecdotal and I do respect your own anecdote. But I can’t help noticing that I see it repeated in lots of bed adverts.
How old are you? Once you reach middle-age shit starts breaking, even if you’re fit which most of us aren’t. You’ll notice a good bed at forty much more than you will at twenty. By sixty you’ll be demanding one.
.
My partner and I have a basic box spring and a Queen-sized free mattress (from a family member.)
We put a 4” thicc memory foam topper on it and I can easily get 13 hours straight of sleep. It’s horrifying.
.
Hahaha nahhh I have a spouse I’ve been with forever and we’re never having kids, so we can sleep as much as we want to. I don’t get 13 hours EVERY day, but occasionally we get fucked up on various substances and need a long day of hibernation afterwards. Last night we got about four hours (special occasion party time!) so tonight we’ll probably get 10+ hours of sleep.
.
Oh 100%!
No shade on peeps who want families but that’s not for us. We gon’ hedonistically burn bright until we die. That’s our best life hahahaha
I’ve read some people get help from the cooling these provide, but I think there’s versions without subscriptions.
Also I’ve read of people buying shit like this in the hope it helps intractable insomnia, and they probably aren’t thinking that clearly, because of sleep deprivation.
I share your suspicions but I’d go further. The bed industry has always struck me as an obvious scam that plays on people’s nebulous health anxieties and also on the tempting cognitive fallacy that, since an 8-hour night is the same amount as an 8-hour workday, the exact physical makeup of your bed is somehow as important as your career or something. It all strikes me as almost completely irrational. People slept for aeons on straw and somehow survived. A bed is a soft flat object, any other abstract properties are just marketing IMO.
Also, eight hours is a modern invention! Throughout most of human history we slept several times a day, rather than just once.
I’m really liking siestas these days and can’t go back to a single eight hour block.
Absolutely. The 8-hour sleep is probably just a marketing invention, related to modern electric light. In pre-modern Europe it was common to get up and do housework in the middle of the night.
To be fair it’s more of a mattress than a bed
If the protocol was documented and simple enough, and if you could make it talk to your smart home RPi, then one could replace AWS with nginx + a perl or lua module.
I want to learn more about this! Searching for "bed backdoor " right now
This assumption is doing a lot of heavy lifting in the authors argument that this is a big deal.
How so, it’s clearly a shared account
I don’t think that’s a wild assumption to make
A shared account doesn’t mean everyone who works there has access to it, or that those who do have access aren’t subject to some type of access control.
The article basically goes on to say that the existence of this key makes a huge difference to the security/privacy of the product. It argues that using it, someone could access data from the device, or use it to upload arbitrary code to the device for it to run. However, those are both things the user is already trusting the company with. They have to trust that the company has access controls/policies to prevent individual rogue employees doing the things described. It seems unreasonable to say that an SSH key being on the device demonstrates that those controls aren’t in place.
I agree to an extent, the user already uses a cloud service. So they have to trust the provider.
And as far as a bed goes, I suppose you can’t expect the customer to ssh into it if something goes wrong and you have to fix it.
Both seems reasonable to me.
Yeah, its not unreasonable that you’d have a remote way to access the device to gather debug data with the customers consent. An SSH key in the firmware is a flexible way to do that, so long as there are good controls in place to ensure that it isn’t misused.
Remember, the “s” in IoT stands for “security”.
I could completely see this email address being a shared email address and not tied to a single user.
I’m 90% sure it is not a single user. I just don’t see how that really affects the security of the product, given that the company that sells it can already do the things the author is saying can be done if you have this key.
To be clear, I wouldn’t buy this. I just don’t think the SSH key makes it any worse than it already was
Would you rather one person have access to your device / data to potentially perform malicious actions or multiple people access to your device / data to potentially perform malicious actions?
And if you tell me multiple people, you’re full of it.
I think multiple people already have access to the databases that store the data the device sends. I don’t really care whether they get the data from the device itself or from the database.
Similarly, I think multiple people have the ability to make changes to the firmware build and the systems that distribute it. So those people already have the potential ability to gain access to the device.
One person or multiple people having unauthorised access are both unacceptable. I’m saying that the users have to trust the companies ability to prevent that occurring, and that therefore this particular technical detail is mostly irrelevant
My man would have been willing to overlook having Jeff bezos himself sleep in his bed with him before realizing what was happening.
This was written by Papa Bear himself
So, umm, my bed suddenly get too hard or soft at night? Yawn.
Talk about building a solution in search of a problem