To Fight Surveillance Pricing, We Need Privacy First (www.eff.org)
from minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to privacy@lemmy.ml on 06 Aug 2024 02:10
https://lemux.minnix.dev/post/442580

#privacy

threaded - newest

autonomoususer@lemmy.world on 06 Aug 2024 04:02 next collapse

Price scamming

delirious_owl@discuss.online on 06 Aug 2024 19:08 next collapse

So, if they can’t fingerprint you then do you get the high price, the low price, or something in the middle?

delirious_owl@discuss.online on 06 Aug 2024 19:09 next collapse

in 2019, investigative journalists revealed that prices on the Target app increased depending on a user’s location. The app collected the user’s geolocation information. The company charged significantly higher prices when a user was in a Target

That’s actually really clever. Evil. But clever.

[deleted] on 06 Aug 2024 19:09 next collapse
.
delirious_owl@discuss.online on 06 Aug 2024 19:14 next collapse

an algorithmic pricing model used by the Princeton Review—a test prep company—allegedly charged higher prices to Asian American customers

Fuck that’s racist

delirious_owl@discuss.online on 06 Aug 2024 19:15 collapse

The FTC sent these orders to Mastercard, Revionics, Bloomreach, JPMorgan Chase, Task Software, PROS, Accenture, and McKinsey & Co.

These eight firms play a key role in the collection, analysis, and weaponization of your private information: they are the “middlemen” that provide surveillance pricing tools to other companies.

Named. Now shame.