Chat Control Violates More Kids than Encrypted CSAM (blenderdumbass.org)
from blenderdumbass@px.madiator.com to privacy@lemmy.ml on 18 Aug 10:30
https://px.madiator.com/post/8662

#privacy

threaded - newest

BlueEther@no.lastname.nz on 18 Aug 10:51 next collapse

Fuck reading a website that upts a popup that puts a rant about my hardware across 1/4 of their content

blenderdumbass@px.madiator.com on 18 Aug 11:18 next collapse

Let me guess, you got the iWarning? lol

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com on 18 Aug 14:25 collapse

I like how the website doesn’t even work anymore.

eldavi@lemmy.ml on 18 Aug 17:16 collapse

seems to work fine

crandlecan@mander.xyz on 18 Aug 10:57 next collapse

This was, logically, a very badly written article. If anything, reading this article steers me towards breaking encryption, a position I would never take.

blenderdumbass@px.madiator.com on 18 Aug 11:19 collapse

Please explain

transebding_the_binary@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 18 Aug 11:13 next collapse

How fucking distasteful is that cover of the article

crandlecan@mander.xyz on 18 Aug 11:19 next collapse

Wtf I hadn’t even noticed it 😡

Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone on 18 Aug 16:48 collapse

The images of the kid from E.T.?

cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone on 18 Aug 16:56 next collapse

i'm sure the kids who were abused would say otherwise

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 18 Aug 19:18 next collapse

Encryption abused them?

Removing encryption is opening a Pandora’s box that won’t protect real victims for even a second.

sakuragasaki46@feddit.it on 21 Aug 20:55 collapse

victims need privacy and secure communication indeed

lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml on 18 Aug 20:02 next collapse

As a person who was sexually abused as a child, please have the courage to state your opinions without using abused kids as a logical crutch.

icelimit@lemmy.ml on 19 Aug 17:44 collapse

Encryption doesn’t abuse kids; pedophiles do. There’re plenty of documented ones in office actually voting for the removal of your (human) rights to privacy.

phoenixz@lemmy.ca on 18 Aug 18:12 next collapse

Bad article, but the point does stand: breaking encryption is stupid, and csam is just an excuse, nothing more, no politician gives a shit about kids

sakuragasaki46@feddit.it on 21 Aug 20:52 collapse

The deal is:

When CSAM is a thing, a child has already been violated.

When conversation is being controlled, government or whoever reads all of your messages.

It means cops can CSAM you, and you can do nothing since cops are “protected people”